Everyone knows the universe doesn't care about anything - that's basic reality. But now we've built systems that copy that indifference and made it worse. When an algorithm decides if your content gets seen or if you get a job interview, it's not looking at whether you're talented. It's looking at whether you fit its pattern. Did you use the right keywords? Does your resume match the scanning software? Are you posting when engagement is highest? It's not about being good anymore. It's about being optimized for a system that was never designed to recognize good in the first place.
This existential shrugging can be crystallized by two seemingly disparate phenomena: the vanishing entry-level job and Spotify’s “Discovery Mode.”
Discovery Mode is essentially a Faustian bargain. It allows artists and labels to identify tracks they want Spotify’s recommendation engine to prioritize—tracks that might get pushed onto Autoplay sequences, Radio features, or key algorithmic playlists. The catch? You have to agree to accept a lower royalty rate (sometimes around 30% less) for the resulting streams. You are voluntarily sacrificing profit per stream for the promise of volume and visibility. You are, in the plainest possible terms, paying to play. Except you aren’t paying with cash, which would be gauche and old-school/Harry Enfieldian, but with the immediate devaluation of your own product. It’s a move that feels less like innovation and more like trying to pay your Sky bill with a gift voucher for Xtra-vision.
What does it say about the state of culture, or perhaps, the state of the post-cultural economy, when the only way to be seen by the machine is to make yourself cheaper for the machine? It suggests that the primary commodity of the modern age is not attention, but access to the funnel. While the X-Factor machine was profoundly cynical, its deal was at least certain: you surrendered all artistic soul to the corporate pop template, but in return, you were handed a massive, guaranteed payoff like the Christmas Number One (Sorry Joe McElderry!). Spotify’s Discovery Mode is far bleaker; it is the ultimate devaluation trap, demanding you make the same core sacrifice, a 30% reduction in your financial worth, not for a guaranteed spotlight but merely for the chance to be considered by an algorithm. You pay an existential tax just to compete in a market now flooded with disposable AI-generated content, institutionalizing the idea that honest, unassisted creative output is economically worthless.
The music world’s equivalent of that first minimum-wage job - the soul-crushing admin work or the endless coffee shop till shift - was the regional gig circuit. Your career began not with a record deal, but with weeks spent driving a cramped transit van, playing unreviewed shows at venues where the main audience was the pool table and that weird guy wearing a "funny" t-shirt. Ambition was the only currency accepted.
Today, that rung is gone, obliterated by a flood of data.
And this is where the AI ecosystem slides in like a greasy, uninvited guest at the cultural dinner party. The problem with Spotify's platform, and indeed, the entire digital creative marketplace, isn’t just that it’s crowded; it's that it’s been turned into a slurry. Spotify recently had to announce a comprehensive effort to combat "AI slop," including the removal of over 75 million "spammy tracks" from its platform in a single year. These aren't necessarily deepfakes of Adele singing operatic sea shanties (though those exist); these are the sonic equivalents of placeholder text - functional, generic soundscapes uploaded in bulk by "content farms" using generative AI to trick the system into paying out micro-royalties.
It's the equivalent of trying to launch a small, artisanal bakery in a town where every other storefront is a massive, identical branch of a low-cost Greggs, churning out 75 million functionally similar sausage rolls an hour. That is the noise floor for a new artist in 2025. It renders the organic path - the path where merit, luck, or even sheer weirdness used to matter effectively impossible. The signal-to-noise ratio is now so low that the only way to be heard is to have the noise filter itself vouch for you. And the noise filter, naturally, wants a cut. The irony is so thick you could use it to insulate a small shed.
The entire structure is now a digital audit, indifferent to human quality and concerned only with its own efficient throughput. Your song is not judged by merit, but by its economic obedience; it remains a platform burden until it has earned its mark of compromise.
Now, let's pivot away from the world of four-minute pop songs and step into the fluorescent horror of the modern office block, or what used to be a modern office block. The parallel here isn’t merely thematic; it’s structural. The young artist is facing the same closed door as the recent college graduate: the total disappearance of the "first rung."
For decades, the entry-level job, which as a junior office admin included me removing sims from network locked phones so they could be jail broken - was the transactional gate through which young people traded time for experience. You endured the soul-crushing spreadsheets or the perpetually handing out faxes for a few years, learned the soft skills (how to adopt non-sequiturs like "hope springs eternal" in a crisis without understanding what either meant) and then you got promoted.
But now, that ladder is being dismantled from the bottom up, not by outsourcing to another country but by outsourcing to a line of code.
Data is no longer speculative on this point. A recent working paper from Stanford highlights that early-career employees in fields most exposed to generative AI have seen a sharp downturn in employment. Specifically, the paper found that entry-level employment in AI-exposed sectors dropped by roughly 13% since 2022, compared to more experienced workers in the same fields. In specific areas like software engineering and customer service that decline was closer to 20% for early-career workers between late 2022 and mid-2025.
Crucially, a report from the British Standards Institution (BSI) noted that 39% of global business leaders confirmed that they have reduced or cut entry-level roles as a result of efficiencies made by AI tools performing research or administrative tasks.
The corporate playbook is brutally logical: Why hire a junior software developer for €40,000 and wait two years for them to become productive when a €20/month subscription to a Large Language Model can execute 80% of their rote coding tasks immediately?
The entry-level job was the mechanism for acquiring institutional capital; the mentorship, the network, the ability to put a specific company name on a CV. Now, AI has automated the tedious, repetitive tasks that provided the justification for the hire, eliminating the scaffolding of the career structure entirely.
So, here is the grotesque synchronicity:
The emerging artist is told, "Your pure, uncompromised artistic output is statistically invisible. We are flooded by millions of hours of AI-generated mood music. If you want a fraction of the attention, you must accept a fraction of the payoff. You must self-devalue to gain access to the visibility funnel."
Today's emerging professional faces an impossible paradox: employers demand mastery-level expertise for entry-level roles because the foundational work has been automated away. The message to graduates is stark: 'We've eliminated the learning curve. Come back when you no longer need one.' It's a locked door that only opens from the inside.
Both scenarios operate on the principle of pre-optimization. You are no longer allowed to be an amateur. You are no longer allowed to be bad, or unpolished, or slow, or "unlearned".
The "pay-to-play" algorithm of Discovery Mode is merely the transactional manifestation of the algorithmic thinking that is eliminating the entry-level career. It's the same core cultural shift: the system is optimizing for efficiency and human inefficiency - the messy, unrepeatable, trial-and-error process of a musician finding their voice or a graduate learning to navigate SharePoint - has been designated a cost to be eliminated. The system demands that value must be proven before access is granted, and the only proof is often a voluntary compromise on that very value.
The bargain has fundamentally reversed. A generation ago, you traded immediate earnings for visibility and opportunity; work cheap, build a reputation, cash in later. Today, you pay a premium just to audition. Unpaid internships, expensive certifications, months of 'trial projects' - these aren't investments in your future, they're table stakes to enter a tournament where most participants go home empty-handed. The job market has adopted the same model: surrender your entry-level salary and the on-the-job training you'll never receive, all for permission to compete against people who already have the mid-career expertise you were supposed to develop here.
This is not the dystopian future we were promised. There are no neon-drenched cyborgs fighting in the streets. The actual dystopia is far more boring, far more transactional, and far more deeply infused with the crushing banality of corporate logic. The future isn't a sci-fi movie; it's just an Excel spreadsheet where the "value" column is permanently set to zero, unless you agree to subtract a little more from the "cost" column. The revolution won't be televised, but it might be played quietly in the background of a coffee shop, generated by a machine that only pays the artists who agree to take a little less so it can afford to generate even more slop.
It's a predator that's eaten all its prey and is now confused about why it's still hungry. The platforms scale infinitely while the creator economy, the actual humans making the things being scaled, contracts into unsustainability. The professional creative class, the people who used to bridge amateur enthusiasm and elite success, is being hollowed out.
Ironically, it's all just breathtakingly inefficient, like burning down your house to stay warm.
Add comment
Comments